Full-Cycle Technical Recruiter

Ryan Mahoney

Ryan Mahoney

Hiring Scientist, FirstWho

"Full-cycle technical recruiting looks simple until you watch someone fail at it. The job requires both Cultural Humility and Clear Communication at high velocity, and most candidates have one without the other. Cultural Humility here means a recruiter who, when an engineering manager rejects their top candidate for 'not technical enough,' asks three clarifying questions instead of defending their sourcing strategy; they discover the manager actually needs distributed systems experience, not the web framework expertise the recruiter assumed. That same recruiter needs Clear Communication when translating messy hiring manager requirements into Boolean strings that actually surface passive candidates, then explaining back to the manager why their 'rockstar' wishlist yields zero viable profiles in this market. Add Intellectual Curiosity, which at this level shows up as someone who spends their own time learning why Kubernetes matters to this team, not just keyword-matching 'Docker' on LinkedIn. The competencies compound this: Boolean Search & Passive Sourcing must be sharp enough to find the senior platform engineer who has no online presence, and Hiring Manager Partnership must be mature enough to push back on unrealistic intake criteria without damaging the relationship. Most candidates can talk about sourcing or talk about partnership. Few can demonstrate both in the same breath."

Get a PDF you can share with your team or import to any ATS.

Use FirstWho to conduct structured interviews.

Competency Questions

1 of 21

Boolean Search & Passive Sourcing

Constructs complex boolean strings and semantic searches across multiple platforms; sources niche technical specializations (e.g., distributed systems, ML infrastructure); optimizes search strategies based on response analytics.

Why this level

Core to sourcing niche technical talent for 5-8 concurrent reqs; manifestation explicitly describes mid-level execution of complex searches and response analytics optimization required for daily sourcing.

Risk if missing

Inability to access passive talent pools, resulting in over-reliance on inbound applications and agencies, extended time-to-fill beyond SLAs, and inability to meet hiring manager expectations for niche technical roles.

Walk me through how you built a candidate pool for a role where your usual sourcing channels weren't yielding results.

Select Interview Round

Assuming 5 minutes per question response

Positive Indicators

  • Mentions specific platforms beyond LinkedIn
  • Describes iterative refinement process
  • References talent density mapping
  • Notes quality vs. volume trade-offs

Negative Indicators

  • Relies solely on LinkedIn Recruiter
  • No mention of iteration or learning
  • Blames market without adapting approach
  • Generic job board posting only
  • 🚩Claims one channel always works
  • 🚩No evidence of adapting to market conditions
  • 🚩Dismisses passive sourcing entirely

Attitude Questions

1 of 25

Cultural Humility

A lifelong commitment to self-evaluation and self-critique regarding power imbalances, cultural differences, and one's own cultural assumptions; marked by openness to learning from others as experts in their own lived experiences rather than claiming mastery of others' cultures. In technical recruiting, this manifests as genuine curiosity about how candidates' backgrounds shape their professional behaviors, willingness to suspend judgment when encountering unfamiliar norms, and active effort to redistribute power in hiring processes by validating diverse expressions of competence.

Recall a time you realized your standard interview approach wasn't working well for candidates from a background different from your own.

Select Interview Round

Assuming 5 minutes per question response

Positive Indicators

  • Noticed candidate shutting down or performing differently
  • Asked candidate how they prefer to demonstrate skills
  • Researched cultural context after the fact
  • Adjusted questions or structure for next round

Negative Indicators

  • Blamed candidate for not fitting process
  • Assumed discomfort indicated poor fit
  • Made no changes for future candidates
  • Required candidate to explain their culture
  • 🚩Describes candidate as 'not a culture fit' due to communication style
  • 🚩Required assimilation to 'standard' process